Lets be honest for one moment. With
technology advancements, downloading music or movies is one click away. And
whilst most individuals are aware that it is illegal, some seem to have the
perception that because millions do it, they are not criminals or will never be
caught.
Of course this leads to the next argument
in terms of piracy : devaluation or validation?
On the other hand, validation is employed to ‘raise the status
of the person involved' (Martin, B, Moore, C and Salter, C. 2010). They become humanized and become the complete opposite to how we sterotype
criminals.
So, lets take a look at Girl Talk, a prime example of
validation within the music industry.
(Image sourced from Forbes Interview)
Gregg Gillis, creator of Girl Talk, composes mashups and samples
of other musicians. Gillis experimentation allows listeners to decipher the
musicians and samples within his songs and becomes somewhat of a name game.
Whilst other musicians pay other artists to use their music/pay a
licensing fee, this is something Gillis does not do. So it begs the question,
is Gillis a criminal and why hasn’t he been charged yet?
Is it because the music industry and established artists are not threatened by one man simply creating music in his room on his laptop?
It should also be noted, that no artists that have been sampled
by the famous Girl Talk has complained.
So what does Gilles think about copyright? In an interview
conducted by Forbes (2012) Gillis revealed he employs a Fair Use argument to tacle
this issue head on.
‘I basically believe in that idea [of Fair
Use], that if you create something out of pre-existing media, that’s
transformative, that’s not negatively impacting the potential sales of the
artist you’re sampling, if it’s not hurting them in some way, then you should
be allowed to make your art and put it out there’ (Gilles cited in Kosner 2012).
Gillis
does not simply layer one sample over another, he shifts the pitch and
exstensively edits each sample so that it is not the same as the original sample.
In the
above clip, Gillies addresses the idea of borrowing intellectual property and
even mentions Kings of Leons and their use of rock elements from the past. He
believes mashups will become more common and that as soon as we become
influenced by something we begin to build upon that idea.
In the
video below, Gillis has credited all artists on his album in the cover and
states ‘I did my own work, but I owe them all the credit because they’re
blatantly on the album.’
What do you think? Is Gregg Gillis a criminal or simply a man trying to create transformative art?
Until next time......
References (and Image):
Kosner, A 2012, Girl Talk's Gregg Gillis on Copyright, Curation and making Mashups Rhyme, Forbes, retrieved 8th August 2013, http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2012/10/07/girl-talks-gregg-gillis-on-copyright-curation-and-making-mashups-rhyme/
Videos:
Good Copy Bady Copy: Interview with Girl Talk 2008, YouTube, Good Copy Bad Copy, 6th December, retrieved 8th August 2013, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ohGc_ukF34
Talk: Everyone Borrows Intellectual Property, eva Kings of Leon 2008, YouTube, Uncensored Interview, 22 September, retrieved 8th August 2013, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQfHTHb2_Wg
Hi Morgan, I enjoyed your post, I liked how you focused on one DJ in particular. Girl Talk was a really good example, especially because I am familiar with this DJ. Including a quote on what Girl Talk or Greg Gillis thinks about copyright gives a great point of view to your post, but I would also like to know what your point of view on this topic is. In you post you mentioned that Girl Talk edits each sample so it is not the same as the original. This raises the question to me of whether changing an artist’s original work in itself is a form of devaluation or some kind of copyright infringement. Perhaps that could be something to consider. Great post!
ReplyDelete